Welcome to issue #037 of Contemporary Football, your inside look at how the game really works behind the scenes.
Monday to Friday, you’ll uncover a new perspective on football business, and sometimes a deeper story that sharpens your thinking and gives you an edge in the beautiful game.
If you need support on your football journey, just write me.

Hey everyone,

Here’s why the Nico Paz contract is one of the smartest pieces of football business.

Because of how control, upside, and risk are distributed.

The basic numbers

Let’s start with facts:

  • Age: 21

  • Contract with Como until 2028

  • Purchase price paid by Como: €6m

  • Reported market interest: ~€65m (Tottenham and Real Madrid)

On paper, this looks like a classic small-club win.

It isn’t.

The buy-back clauses: where the deal is decided

Real Madrid never lost control.

Buy-back structure:

  • June 2025: €9m (expired)

  • June 2026: €10m

  • June 2027: €11m

Meaning:
A player whose value increased by €50–60m in one season can leave for €10m in June.

That’s the deal.

Como’s perspective: upside is capped by design

From Como’s side:

  • Maximum capital gain if buy-back is triggered: ~€7m (6/4=1.5 ; 1.5×2=3 ; 10-3=7)

  • Sporting upside: one full season of high-level performance

  • Financial upside: limited, intentionally

This is not failure.
It’s the acceptance of the position.

Como traded potential upside for sporting impact.

Madrid’s perspective: control without risk

Real Madrid also secured:

  • The right to match any “monster offer” before buy-back windows

  • 50% sell-on clause on any future transfer

So if a club bids €70m:

Madrid either matches or lets the player move, making €35m.

In both cases, Madrid captures most of the upside.

Key point:
Madrid carries no balance-sheet risk, no amortisation pressure, no wage inflation.

Yet they control the asset.

This is not a loan. And not a gamble.

This structure is often misunderstood.

It is not:

  • A normal loan with option

  • A developmental favour to a small club

  • A gamble on future value

It’s distributed ownership logic.

👉 Sporting risk sits with Como
👉 Financial upside sits with Madrid
👉 Market risk is neutralised through clauses

Everyone knows the rules.
Everyone signs anyway.

Why this matters

Because modern football is no longer about:

“Who owns the player?”

It’s about:

“Who controls the outcomes?”

Elite clubs are shifting their focus from balance-sheet exposure to optionality, timing, and asymmetric upside.

Nico Paz is not an exception.
He is the blueprint.

The clubs that still measure success only by transfer fees are already behind.

See you tomorrow,

Federico

Whenever you are ready, there are three ways I can help you with:
Advisory for Clubs: Build. Fix. Grow.
Book a Call: Think clearer. Move faster.
Lecturing: Teach the game behind the game.

Keep Reading

No posts found